全文预览

画钟试验(CDT)定性研究各错误类别在痴呆亚型及其严重程度方面表现差异性分析

上传者:幸福人生 |  格式:pdf  |  页数:57 |  大小:0KB

文档介绍
threegroups,whilethereisnodifferencebetweenthethreegroups.Chi.squaretestshowedthatamongfourgroups,sixerrortypesofqualitativeanalysisoftheCDTexceptsizeandPERareofstatisticallysignificantdifference.Inthegroupsofmild,moderateandseverecases,whichweredividedonthebasisofMMSEscore,theincidenceofthesixcategoriesoferrorinAD,VaD,ODgroupsandtotaldistributionincreasedastheseverityofdiseaseincreased.urves,thebestcutoffvaluefordiagnosisofADwithqualitativeanalysisoftheCDTwas15.5points(AUC=0.821),andsensitivityandspecificitywere70%and82%respectively.ThebestcutoffvalueforthediagnosisofVaDwas6.5points(AUC=0.837),andsensitivityandspecificitywere55%and97%respectivelyMoreover,thebestcutoffvalueforthediagnosisofcognitiveimpairmentwas6.5points(AUC=0.837),andsensitivityandspecificitywere70%and82%respectively6万方数据

收藏

分享

举报
下载此文档