“管委会-公司”模式的治理绩效与控权困境——基于一项典型案例的研究

nstmteg),atpresentstagesincethe叩eningupa11drefo珊,andalsooneo唱anizationalgoVemaIlcet00ltallying而th“1andmanagement”strategicheightoflocalgovemments.IJocalgovemmentsacquiredhighgoV—emancepe—brmanceaturbanoperation6eldsvia“pany’’anizationalfr丑咖ework.However,theconfusionof“govemment—ente叩rise”powerandthede6ciencyofpowercontrolmechaIlismalsol-esultedinthehighriskofpowerabuse.TheoriginalHangzhou“prehensiVePreser—mittee—CanalGroup”isatypical“pany”anizationaJfhme—work.Itso唱anizationalped’o珊ance,poweroperationmodeandcurrentsplittingandrestmcturingroutecan.nectthesystemdilemmafacedbysuchdevelopmentmodeatpresentanditsfuturedeVelopmentorientation.[Keywords]“pany”,opemtingbehaVior,goVemancepeI{’o珊ance,powercontrol[Author]zhouLuyaoLectureratcitycouege,zhejianguniVersity.Hangzhon3100272016年第7期总第373期51万方数据