3743.39334.9415.354026.90211.98839.99327.7115.143604.67189.76941.42331.6515.283127.90164.671043.61306.2313.823320.57174.801156.43372.9616.663367.15177.27Average52.48347.5915.533480.63183.23S.D10.0249.982.36371.4719.55RSD19.1014.3815.2110.6710.67表2甜瓜品种脆度精密度品种瓜1(g)瓜2(g)瓜3(g)瓜4(g)瓜5(g)平均脆度(g)相对标准偏差(%)甬甜6号299.92281.55254.21255.80271.05272.516.99金香玉183.23210.74219.25211.80210.56207.126.68从表1中可以看出平均力和面积的准确度较梯度高,取平均力作为参数对同一品种的不同甜瓜进行精密度分析5个瓜的RSD分别为11.0%,4.8%,4.3%,8.2%,7.4%,具有较好的精密度。从表2中可以看出所选取的参数平均脆度能够对某一品种的甜瓜的脆度进行较好表征。甜瓜脆度数字感官的运用表3春秋两季甜瓜脆度比较品种 F1F2梯度F-T1:2面积F-T1:2平均值F1:2ggg/secg.secg09A58春21.4975.58587.622.8530.9409A58秋60.11281.001912.8916.24140.6509A70春13.8642.13428.891.4922.5809A70秋60.14391.372370.9624.63176.36东方蜜1号春96.50278.883339.429.60175.79东方蜜1号秋87.53328.073690.7412.66194.29表4不同培养方法所得甜瓜脆度比较
全文预览
