social mobility and are thus unable to\rilluminate the cultural subordination of Puerto Ricans as a colonial minority.\r(4+)§*¨©ª«¬/\r“¯°”²³´ µ ¶·¸\r¹º» (Divided\rSociety) ¼L½~F\r¾0²¿ÀÁÂÃÄÅ+ÆÇÈÉ·Ê%ËÌ͹ºÎ\rÏÐ\rÑÒÓÔÕÖÑ×ØDÙ$ÚCÛÜÝÞ[ßÄÂÃÄÅ\r`ÆDà\rÔ\r-.p/0123456785áâ5ãäA\r9:0;.åæ`*çandèé\rê[.<jk\r[-P?andfëáâì\rthey (×níîï\r©8the radical critiques,)J are thus able t o B%îïðñ\ròó§kô-tõö©8÷g.L\røùúûattach A to B Í illuminate C as\rD ÿA0B0C , p?\r??\rEven the "radical" critiques of this mainstream research model,\rsuch as the critiquedeveloped in Divided Society, attach the issue of ethnic\rassimilation too mechanically to factors of economic and social mobility and\rare thus unable to illuminate the cultural subordination of Puerto Ricans as a\rcolonial minority