r[D]aestheticexperienceisnotintrinsicallyvaluable\r23.WhichofthefollowingisNOTwhatHegelbelieved?\r[A]Thecontentandformoftheworkofartcannotbeseparated\rfromeachother.\r[B]Thecontentoftheworkofartisalwaysthetrueobjectof\raestheticinterest.\r[C]Thecontentpresentedwithoutanyindividualityisnotthe\rcontentoftheworkofart.\r[D1Thecontentunderstoodbymeansofaprocessofdiscursive\rthoughtisnomorethanahusk.\r24.Premisesthatarerelatedtoeachotherseemstobedispensable\rbecause.\r[A]Kantthinkstheyareindispensable\r[B]eitherofthemcanresolvetheparadox\r[C]thepremisesareseparated\r[D]thepremisescanaccountforthetheory\r25.Thispassageismainlyabout.\r[A]thesensuousappreciationofart\r[Blthebasicconceptionoftheaestheticexperience\r[C]howtoappreciatetheworkofart\r[D]therelationshipbetweenformandcontentoftheworkofart