t(insists)onnotcastinganimalsas\rpropertiesofhumanbeings.Despitethedifferentapproaches,advocates\rbroadly(consent)totheopinionthatanimalsshouldbeviewedas\rnon-human\rmembersofthemoralcommunityandshouldbe(omitted)frombeing\rfood,clothing,entertainment,orresearchsubjects.Theideaof(7)\r(awarding)rightstoanimalswinsthesupportofseveral\rprominentscholars.\rHowever,somecriticsarguethatanimalsareunabletoenterintoa\rsocialcontractormoral(compass)andforthatreasoncannotbegranted\rrights.Onlyhumanshavedutiesand,therefore,onlyhumanshaverights.\rThereisnothingwrongor(evil)aboutusinganimalsasresourcessolongas\rthereisnounnecessarysuffering.Fromwithintheanimalrightsmovement\ritself,therehasalsobeen(criticism)ofcertainformsofanimalrights\ractivism,inparticularthedestructionoffurfarmsandanimallaboratories.